E-ISSN 2218-6050 | ISSN 2226-4485
 

Original Article


Effectiveness of slow motion video compared to real time video in improving the accuracy and consistency of subjective gait analysis in dogs

D.M. Lane, S.A. Hill, J.L. Huntingford, P. Lafuente, R. Wall, K.A. Jones.

Abstract
Objective measures of canine gait quality via force plates, pressure mats or kinematic analysis are considered superior to subjective gait assessment (SGA). Despite research demonstrating that SGA does not accurately detect subtle lameness, it remains the most commonly performed diagnostic test for detecting lameness in dogs. This is largely because the financial, temporal and spatial requirements for existing objective gait analysis equipment makes this technology impractical for use in general practice. The utility of slow motion video as a potential tool to augment SGA is currently untested. To evaluate a more accessible way to overcome the limitations of SGA, a slow motion video study was undertaken. Three experienced veterinarians reviewed video footage of 30 dogs, 15 with a diagnosis of primary limb lameness based on history and physical examination, and 15 with no indication of limb lameness based on history and physical examination. Four different videos were made for each dog, demonstrating each dog walking and trotting in real time, and then again walking and trotting in 50% slow motion. For each video, the veterinary raters assessed both the degree of lameness, and which limb(s) they felt represented the source of the lameness. Spearman’s rho, Cramer’s V, and t-tests were performed to determine if slow motion video increased either the accuracy or consistency of raters’ SGA relative to real time video. Raters demonstrated no significant increase in consistency or accuracy in their SGA of slow motion video relative to real time video. Based on these findings, slow motion video does not increase the consistency or accuracy of SGA values. Further research is required to determine if slow motion video will benefit SGA in other ways.

Key words: Canine, Diagnosis, Lameness, Subjective, Video.


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by D.M. Lane
Articles by S.A. Hill
Articles by J.L. Huntingford
Articles by P. Lafuente
Articles by R. Wall
Articles by K.A. Jones
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

D.M. Lane, S.A. Hill, J.L. Huntingford, P. Lafuente, R. Wall, K.A. Jones. Effectiveness of slow motion video compared to real time video in improving the accuracy and consistency of subjective gait analysis in dogs. Open Vet J. 2015; 5(2): 158-165. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2015.v5.i2.p158


Web Style

D.M. Lane, S.A. Hill, J.L. Huntingford, P. Lafuente, R. Wall, K.A. Jones. Effectiveness of slow motion video compared to real time video in improving the accuracy and consistency of subjective gait analysis in dogs. https://www.openveterinaryjournal.com/?mno=235334 [Access: February 07, 2023]. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2015.v5.i2.p158


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

D.M. Lane, S.A. Hill, J.L. Huntingford, P. Lafuente, R. Wall, K.A. Jones. Effectiveness of slow motion video compared to real time video in improving the accuracy and consistency of subjective gait analysis in dogs. Open Vet J. 2015; 5(2): 158-165. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2015.v5.i2.p158



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

D.M. Lane, S.A. Hill, J.L. Huntingford, P. Lafuente, R. Wall, K.A. Jones. Effectiveness of slow motion video compared to real time video in improving the accuracy and consistency of subjective gait analysis in dogs. Open Vet J. (2015), [cited February 07, 2023]; 5(2): 158-165. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2015.v5.i2.p158



Harvard Style

D.M. Lane, S.A. Hill, J.L. Huntingford, P. Lafuente, R. Wall, K.A. Jones (2015) Effectiveness of slow motion video compared to real time video in improving the accuracy and consistency of subjective gait analysis in dogs. Open Vet J, 5 (2), 158-165. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2015.v5.i2.p158



Turabian Style

D.M. Lane, S.A. Hill, J.L. Huntingford, P. Lafuente, R. Wall, K.A. Jones. 2015. Effectiveness of slow motion video compared to real time video in improving the accuracy and consistency of subjective gait analysis in dogs. Open Veterinary Journal, 5 (2), 158-165. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2015.v5.i2.p158



Chicago Style

D.M. Lane, S.A. Hill, J.L. Huntingford, P. Lafuente, R. Wall, K.A. Jones. "Effectiveness of slow motion video compared to real time video in improving the accuracy and consistency of subjective gait analysis in dogs." Open Veterinary Journal 5 (2015), 158-165. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2015.v5.i2.p158



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

D.M. Lane, S.A. Hill, J.L. Huntingford, P. Lafuente, R. Wall, K.A. Jones. "Effectiveness of slow motion video compared to real time video in improving the accuracy and consistency of subjective gait analysis in dogs." Open Veterinary Journal 5.2 (2015), 158-165. Print. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2015.v5.i2.p158



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

D.M. Lane, S.A. Hill, J.L. Huntingford, P. Lafuente, R. Wall, K.A. Jones (2015) Effectiveness of slow motion video compared to real time video in improving the accuracy and consistency of subjective gait analysis in dogs. Open Veterinary Journal, 5 (2), 158-165. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2015.v5.i2.p158